首页> 外文OA文献 >Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
【2h】

Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的经桡动脉与经股动脉入路。随机对照试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Transfemoral approach (TFA) remains the most common vascular access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in many countries. However, in the last years several randomized trials compared transradial approach (TRA) with TFA in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but only few studies were powered to estimate rare events. The aim of the current study was to clarify whether TRA is superior to TFA approach in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. A meta-analysis, meta-regression and trial sequential analysis of safety and efficacy of TRA in ACS setting was performed.
机译:在许多国家,经股动脉入路(TFA)仍然是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的最常见血管通路。但是,在最近几年中,一些随机试验比较了急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的经radi动脉入路(TRA)与TFA,但只有少数研究能够评估罕见事件。本研究的目的是阐明经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ACS患者TRA是否优于TFA方法。进行荟萃分析,荟萃回归和试验顺序分析,以评估ACS在ACS中的安全性和有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号